Favorite Links
| | |
YouTube Videos
| | |
Blog Network
| | |
Search
| | |
Syndication
| | | | |
In My Thoughts On (excerpts from various threads) Universal Expansion 2 |
#20  06-30-2008 11:33 PM |
Re: Toronic Concepts - 5-28-08
Quote:
Originally Posted by analog 
Hello Dave,
Below is an extremely crude animation of what I was referring to in my last two posts. It's nothing fancy, because I'm just learning how to build a gif animation. The black line represents the initial fundamental substance at its most condensed state traveling with absolute uniform linear velocity (absolute zero/one degree of freedom). The large expansion is the universe as the fundamental substance slows linearly and increases in random motion, and the smaller cones that appear later are the contracting representations of galaxies as the fundamental substance reaccelerates towards absolute uniform linear velocity.
I'm just trying to
| ...More  | |
In My Thoughts On (excerpts from various threads) Universal Expansion 1 | |
#19 05-18-2008 07:47 PM |
Re: Toronic Concepts - 5-18-08
Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
Hello Dave,
I have some ideas I’d like to share with you. I think I have a concept you may be interested in; if you haven't already thought of it. It just adds to your current model.
If absolute zero is one degree of freedom whereby the maximum linear velocity is maintained, and before the initial collision, the fundamental substance was at this one degree of freedom whereby it had total uniform linear motion; thus it was at its most condensed state perpendicular to its direction of travel (universal direction). We could view the direction of travel as the arrow of time. Being as any random motion causes the fundamental substance to spread p
| ...More | |
In My Thoughts On (excerpts from various threads) Emergence 2 | |
#18 05-10-2008 02:08 PM |
Re: What is Emergence? - 05-06-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
Hey Dave,
You may view yourself as "ignorant" in the traditional scientific field of emergence, but you are far from "ignorant" within your own framework, and that's where the traditional scientific field of emergence possibly hasn't yet looked; but you can.
I remember reading an old quote once, I think by Franklin or Edison, which said something to the effect of: “The key to success is realizing that we can’t make opportunities happen; all we can do is ready ourselves by gaining knowledge; that we may recognize them when we see them; whereby we're then able to take advantage of them.” That isn’t exactly word for word
| ...More | |
In My Thoughts On (excerpts from various threads) Emergence 1 | |
#17 05-04-2008 06:02 AM |
Re: What is Emergence? - 05-04-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
Hello Dave,
How about a chat on emergence? I’m not talking about a philosophical debate about what consciousness may or may not be. I’m talking about the mechanism within our individual frameworks that allow for the formation of the physical biological bodies of life; the function and the form.
Many theorist get so caught up on focusing on their microcosmic mechanisms (atomic structures), they often neglect the need for the mechanism which builds the obviously needed varying medium densities surrounding the massive bodies/objects such as the galaxies, stars and planets. It is this increased medium density which allows for percie
| ...More | |
In My Thoughts On (excerpts from various threads) Purpose of Life | |
#14 05-02-2008 04:20 AM |
Re: What is the Root of all human evil according to Tina? - 03-15-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
At the risk of repeating someone elses answer, I would like to give this a shot.
From my view, the world is an eternal system. In other words, it doesn't contain anything whose function doesn't effect the function of another, until a complete cycle is formed, with all things innertwinned. For something to exist without purpose, within an eternal system, would mean that the system isn't eternal and it is fallible. Thus, it will eventually collapse or cease to exist.
This would also encompass our actions. Therefore, there is no such thing as evil. There is only necessity to maintain eternity. Our perception
| ...More | |
In My Thoughts On (excerpts from various threads) Energy | |
#13 04-30-2008 10:15 PM |
Re: Paradox of Potential popped Aware. - 04-09-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
I don't believe in any of the forces (energy) of modern science. I believe they are misconceptions of the only true interaction, motion. Thus, rocks move with the flow of the rest of the universe, as do we.
|
From A PM - 4-27-2008
Quote: |
Originally Posted by analog
I would presume you have found your other (microcosmic) forces in the building of your fundamental objects (your idea). Perhaps gravity and electromagnatism (light) elude you because they are related to the entire structure, or the point where your ideas build the entire framework.
I believe the correct arrangement of the fundamental builders, whatever they may be, into a correct framework will
| ...More | |
In My Thoughts On (excerpts from various threads) Motion and Temperature | |
#7 04-28-2008 02:31 AM |
Re: 2008-04-19: What is Time? - 04-22-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
Good answer Pat, but what are we really measuring when we measure temperature? Energy?
My naive thoughts tell me that if we make motion the absolute, and we build a framework which is trying to equalize its matter in motion, degrees of temperature takes on the roll of spatial degrees of freedom of the fundamental material building blocks, and thermodynamics become spatialdynamics, whereby the potiential for motion (temperature difference) between two massive bodies is equivalent to the spatial to particle ratio/density between them.
Absolute zero then becomes massive formations of matter which contain only Planck volumes of space, and
| ...More | |
In My Thoughts On (excerpts from various threads) Search For A ToE | |
#6 04-28-2008 01:30 AM |
Re: am I thick because I dont understand - 04-05-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
A general unification theory will reveal to us the fundamental mechanism used to create our world. It would also point us in the direction to look for the reason for life, consciousness, etc., which are things we generally don't relate to physics.
If we were to work from the foundation of a true general unification theory outward, it would be realized that it's the fundamental foundation of a TOE. This would give us the tools we need to probe all and any realm of our world: reality, existence, counsciousness, universal mechanics, etc. It would unite what could be viewed as abstract entities in our world with those entities we v
| ...More | |
In My Thoughts On (excerpts from various threads) Mechanism For Consciousness/Life | |
#5 04-27-2008 11:20 PM |
Re: Toronic Concepts - 04-09-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
I, too, find life/consciousness to be the hardest concept to understand, or be explained by a physical framework, whereby a GUT would take its first steps to becoming a TOE, in my opinion. I feel this is the real hurdle most GUTs face, if they ever are intended to become the foundation of a TOE, but even though it would appear that a GUT has no need for life/consciousness to define the laws that govern motion, and that an entire universe can seemingly be built without any implication of life/consciousness, I’m not sure it can.
It would seem that our “free will” and the laws that govern the planets and stars are in no way related
| ...More | |
In My Thoughts On (excerpts from various threads) Motion, Time and Relativity | |
#4 04-27-2008 11:17 PM |
Re: 2008-04-19: What is Time? - 04-23-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
Due to how I view our universe, we have two forms of time, because we have two instances of motion/velocity. We have the individual absolute motions/velocities of the fundamental builders (particles) and we have their collective motion/velocity when they become dense enough (massive object) to collectively move through a less dense medium of fundamental builders, whereby the individual particles that form the massive object are still moving in random directions (frequency) within the space they occupy, but the whole collection (massive object) is moving uniformly in one direction. It is the essence of this duality of directions that allows f
| ...More |
| | |
Categories
| | | |
Monthly Archives
| | | | < > October 2008 | | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 28 | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
| |
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
| |
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
| |
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
| |
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 |
|
My Profile
| I'm a self-taught amateur artist, musician, writer, and inventor, who dabbles in electronics, math, and theoretical physics. I'm a student of nature. Gender: Male Country: United States Occupation: slave to the grind Interests: learning AKA: Tim My Specialty: self-teaching | |
