Sunday, December 30, 2007
Dark energy a furphy, says new paper
’Dark energy’, which researchers have spent years trying to fathom, isn’t necessary to explain our universe after all, according to a new solution to Einstein’s theory of general relativity. This challenges the notion that dark energy makes up 76% of our universe, as many cosmologists believe.
What if there is no spacetime continuum? What if space and time derive from the discontinuous projection of matter? If atoms are independently and synchronously projected from their quantum energy equivalents in a timeless and spatially indeterminate quantum field that is orthogonal to the integrated fabric of space-time, then a different interpretation of gravity emerges naturally.
From this quantum relativistic approach the need for dark matter and/or dark energy to explain the missing mass disappears. Matter is not free to move at the beck and call of gravity because the complex patterns of angular inertia in the universe as a whole require a preponderance of synchronicity in the primary projection of matter.
There is direct evidence of this in Foucault’s pendulum. The swings of the pendulum may be driven by the earth’s gravity but they are independent from the earth’s rotation. Since the direction of the pendulums swings remain constant with the fixed stars and not with the earth’s rotation they are synchronous with the primary projection of matter in the universe as a whole.
General relativity offers no satisfactory explanation for this. Without a spacetime continuum there is no basis for a Big Bang. Galaxies become cells creatively regenerating there own stellar populations. Alternate explanations emerge for the red shift and background radiation. There is more on this in website articles entitled “Gravity and Historic Coordinates,” “Unified Theories, Fantasy, & Cosmic Order,” and various others at http://www.cosmic-mindreach.com .
Next entry: Stranger that fiction: parallel universes beguile science
Previous entry: Absolute Hot