View Single Post
That is the intention
Old
  (#46 (permalink))
Fredrick
4th degree Black Belt
Fredrick is a jewel in the roughFredrick is a jewel in the rough
 
Fredrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 587
Thanks Given: 44
Thanked 99x in 81 Posts
Join Date: May 2004
Rep Power: 23
   
That is the intention - 03-21-2005, 02:57 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Your question seems to be unverifiable by experiments. But i cannot agree that it is a sphere.
That it is unverifiable is beyond questioning; our universe started only once (in my view) and cannot be repeated (by us). You are right that it is not really a sphere, because that would include the inside, while I am trying to exclude the inside as part of a possible theoretical start for our universe. Since we only have one beginning there aren't any good words to describe the state. The closest I can get is an emerging outwardly moving sphere that contains an inner area in which no materialization takes place as part of the emerging process. Just like writing a clear sentence often requiresthespacesbetweenthewords to make it really legible, such an area in which materialization did not take place within the process of materialization is similarly fundamental (helps to clarify what did materialize).

Naturally, I simply place this next to the theory in which everything started to materialize from a center position (in which theory the phenomenon of nothing is simply not that important). Which one of the two was the actual beginning? I do not think we can actually verify either one (though I do deliver mathematical evidence that nothing is a fundamental part of it all).


The difference between a structure based on unification and a structure without unification hinges on the question if nothing is just plain nothing or if nothing is mighty fundamental. Read In Search of a Cyclops with titillating mathematical evidence (see homepage) to find out if separation belongs to the fundamental basics of our universe - or not.
  
Reply With Quote