Theory of Everything - View Single Post

Rufus · 12-23-2005, 05:22 PM

Sorry no big bang at the so-called beginning. There probably was no beginning and the idea of considering a beginning to be caused by some cataclysmic change to a bunch of super dense material is laughable. Where did this material come from? The bounce theory is also silly, that being that the universe recondenses and starts all over again.

Your phi universe has merit though. In art one does not measure. One simply uses rations that seem proper and they all relate to phi.

Namron (Rufus)

	(#6 (permalink))
Rufus 2nd degree Black Belt Status: Offline Posts: 292 Thanks Given: 16 Thanked 12x in 12 Posts Join Date: May 2005 Rep Power: 15	12-23-2005, 05:22 PM Sorry no big bang at the so-called beginning. There probably was no beginning and the idea of considering a beginning to be caused by some cataclysmic change to a bunch of super dense material is laughable. Where did this material come from? The bounce theory is also silly, that being that the universe recondenses and starts all over again. Your phi universe has merit though. In art one does not measure. One simply uses rations that seem proper and they all relate to phi. Namron (Rufus)