Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rufus Call it anti-matter if you wish but the idea of a balance with our so-called matter, being required, is quite universal. |
I don't get what you mean by this?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rufus The matter of which you speak does not exist in the first place, and the lack of it is the balance required. You can appreciate the appearancy of matter through your senses only and this is how it appears to exist but does not. |
If you think anti-matter doesn't exist, what are black holes made of? What are the particles of our matter changed to their opposite charge?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rufus Paul Dirac is quite correct in his assumptions but he is using a faulty math system. Mathematics of this nature is too inflexible to be of any use. |
Well, I can think of two uses: explaining and understanding nature and controling and predicting nature. And any way, the math is not inflexible anymore, not since the xx century: QM, chaos theory, statistical calculus... The math of the universe is now completely statistical, randomized, unsure and probabilistic.