[Marko]

Take for an example the cosmological constant,which determines the acceleration of the universe. Larger the constant,sooner we are in the Big Freeze,and if the constant is negative,sooner we are in the Big Crunch.I think that there is some min. and max. because at some extremely huge positive value of the cosmological constant there would be immediate Big Freeze, and at certain negative value the universe would have contracted violently into a Big Crunch.After this points, I think,there would be no extra-effect on the particles because they already reached points of immediate B. Crunch and B. Freeze.

So, maybe some constants can not be deducted on finite interval directly,in the theory,on the paper. But when in real world,interrelated with other constants and perhaps with the properties of the particles (as in my example),we could indirectly deduct them on some finite values.Extremely large intervals, but finite. Exception of this „rule“ would probably be the total amount of the energy in the universe.I wonder, could we do some useful speculations about this total amount of energy?

Is this the right way thinking?

Regards!