View Single Post
reductionism vs holism
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
AntonioLao
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
reductionism vs holism - 12-29-2005, 02:08 PM

Reductionists believe that all of physical reality is comprehensible by studying the parts that comprise the whole. On the other hand, holistic philosophers believe that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
When applying these philosophies to the study of the universe, quantum mechanics would represent the reductionist approach, while general relativity would represent the holistic approach. Reductionism is a particle formalism in contrast to the field formalism of holism. However, the combined approach would be represented by a quantum field theory. The approach that studies the interactions of particle and field. Nevertheless, the question remains: which is more fundamental? Vector field? Or scalar field? Vector field deals with magnitude and direction, while scalar field deals only with magnitude.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Reply With Quote