[Omni]

@zeroca: I still can't quite understand what you mean. I think you are saying: "nothing does exist, but it isn't a phenomenon in 3-D space within time so to us with our limited "3-d space within time-observation" it seems nothing". Am I correct? I can't really imagine that you mean that and still refer to it as being "nothing". Nothing can't be refered to as "it" ("this process happens within it" etc.). So ,in my opinion, you should or use a different word instead of "nothing" ("the absolute undetectable (TAU)" or something like that) or, if you really mean 0, face the fact that nothing can't split and that maybe you're on the wrong route... . I would really like someone to convince me that nothing can be split, but I think that will never happen.