[baudrunner]

There is no doubt much more to the nature of human evolution by progressive enhancement of the DNA than we can know at present, it is simply too complex. But my thinking is that there are multiple functionalities which work in tandem. For example, I developed a theory whereby the 98% of DNA not encoded for protein synthesis is also purposeful in other ways. The assembly of the DNA molecule inside the nucleus is bundled into a complex knot of sorts, winding and bending and folding around and around. In the same way that a bend in a steel bar exposes the curved corner to a greater possibility of fracture, note the spreading texture on the surface, and where repeated bending back and forth can actually break it, the corners and bends of the DNA molecule are also potentially more vulnerable to mutations because of their weakend bonds, which are stretched. If 98% of the DNA are essentially expendable segments not crucial to the continued existence of the host then statistically they present a reduced probability that a mutation will occur on a valid gene segment. I think that the actual characteristic conformation of the DNA is unique to the individual and that the basic form is passed on to offspring, hence inherited genetic diseases, which over time will stop expressing themselves as the DNA evolves.

I would like to apologize to zeroca for sort of hijacking this thread, or at least deviating from its intent, which started originally as a discussion of the nervous response mechanism and somehow veered into a discussion of the process of evolution. Sorry about that, no doubt your post will be a popular reference for future studies by all of us. Thank you.