View Single Post
neutrino deficits or surpluses
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
AntonioLao
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
neutrino deficits or surpluses - 01-04-2006, 12:50 PM

When dealing with nuclear processes such as fusion and fission, the unsung heroes are truly the underpaid, underestimated, less credited, less glorified, behind the scene worker bee neutrinos. Without them neither fusion nor fission process can be realized.

Negative evidence of their mysterious disappearances or appearances has mounted since their existence was postulated by Pauli in 1930, subsequently christened by Fermi, detected by Reines and Cowan in 1956. One of these negativities is the where about of the right-handed species. Another is the missing solar neutrinos, 2/3 cannot be accounted for.

The truth is they are workaholics’ busy working and creating mass and energy out of space-time within inner space of stellar systems. However, when they are just roaming in deep outer space, usually they are blamed for being unfriendly and non-interactive. The truth is they just don’t want to be in places where they are not wanted, for example, during supernova explosions. They unfailingly give us all the 1st warning signs of the onset of these catastrophic cosmic accidents. If they have been steadily working and harmoniously cooperating inside stellar systems then almost all stars would become red super-giants at the ripe old age of several billions years. Without neutrinos the universe cannot exist.

If they become organized then they help the formation of neutron stars. If they become super-organized then they exclusively formed a black hole among themselves. A black hole is really a neutrino star. It can then be said that even the big bang singularity is the result of infinity of claustrophobic neutrinos. A neutrino (little neutral one) could have no mass but infinity of them should have infinite mass.

When they exit the nucleus then we get radioactive decays and the terrible effects of fission reaction and chaos. On the contrary, when they enter the nucleus then we should get the possibility of fusion reaction, which promises limitless source of energy and also capable of restoring order, peace, and harmony to the entire universe as a cause of initiating a big crunch back to singularity.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Reply With Quote