Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dleviwing Hi Mike; It seems your 60 days are up and none of your predictions came to pass.
Though many may find your system entertaining and amusing, I do not believe it is going to qualify as a scientific endeavor nor do I expect it to replace astrology. |
Thanks for the feedback Dave, I hope you checked this with an open mind and accurate understanding. I cannot remember the details, my interest is structure and I seem remember something you are referring to but not on any topic in this thread. As your focus is on me, not science, I get a disturbing feeling that you are deeply disappointed with my honest attempt to establish facts and linkages that are efficient and useful.
Surely you misinterpreted something as my prediction, the systems I use are mechanical, I try not to intervene. I remain innocent to your charges.
I find the search for valid explanations and mathematics neither entertaining nor amusing and I see you digging a knife in with such condescending remarks. I find it reckless, annoying, and frustrating. And exhilirating.
I also think you might have more specific feedback as to what happened and to what you are referring - language is a very limited form - no amount of words can express a simple animal or bird, let alone experience, and the form of words is not actually the reality of any process or form. The point is whether there are rhythms and cycles in the world, are they regular or irregular, and is that irregularity actually a complex but calculable interaction.
I was shocked during my visit to New York to find signs that Human Design (q.v.) will catch on among certain media professionals. Not because they are logical, unfortunately, but because they need efficient tools that work, and I find that astonishing, these are busy and professional people, and I feel I want to see this at closer quarters in case they are correct. I was seeking skilled logicians who are unwilling to resort to any beliefs, show business can be superstitious, so we will see. I think you too are focussing on false things - belief, entertainment, prediction, and astrology, and I remain clear where I stand, however clumsily I express myself at times.
To remind you, it appears to me that the topic of this thread is Fractal Dialectics as a Theorem and Conjecture within Mathematics. I certainly think you are off topic, and you are in fact replying to either your frustration and disappoinment with me personally, in an attempt to warn others by the style I see here, or the topic of Human Design. Human Design is a possible Theory of Everything, posted elsewhere, and personally I find precision in such matters useful and courteous. However, I have been a terrible offender in such matters, it is easily done if not nipped in the bud.
Be well. It is still technically the season of goodwill, until midnight tomorrow (Twelfth Night) at least...