| Why the "black hole' and "big bang" collapse into history
What I had written earlier concerning an experiment to demonstrate why a black hole cannot exist, and because this is true the big bang is invalid, emperically this may be demonstrated by two different concepts:
The first concept to examine is the value an accelerating mass would have if it were within the 0.716 distance from the core point of our planet. A mass in this location would be accelerating to a speed greater than that of the speed of light. In our sun, the distance is 400 miles from the center of that mass. If a mass cannot exist in these locations, then how could a mass great enough to contain all that of the universe be in one location?
The next point is that of the experiment itself. That which forms a gravitational field is a product of eme - which is the basis of mass. Energy is released in form of waves that cannot be intercepted and changed in value. The experiment I propose to do, and have done, forms and collapses a gravitational field using a same mass. Thus energy is released in form of g. waves. If this is done on a small scale, it would also be done on a greater one, thus reducing a mass so that it could not form a black hole or a big bang. This is further evidenced in that our planet must expend 0.00444 kg/sec to keep things in place, and the sun 665 lbs/sec to do the same. The g. experiment offer is still open. Deal with that first.  |