Theory of Everything - View Single Post

Guille · 01-09-2006, 02:51 PM

Duane,

About your three questions post:

1. It is NOT possible to create or destroy energy, we can only converse it into different types. If you can think of an example or experiment to proof otherwise, state it. Nothing you've wrote does so.

2. It is NOT possible to do any work without energy (or energy source). Because in order to apply a force at a distance (this is the physical and mathematical description of work) you must have a previous energy.

3. Gravity is a force, as are the other three fundamental forces: Strong Nuclear, Weak Nuclear, and ElectroMagnetic. All of these forces impply energy, not vice versa (if there is force there must be energy, but if the is energy, force is not neccesarilly there).

Nevertheless, discussion about your theory is not possible because it is wrong from the start idea that relativistic mass is the same as rest mass. It's just as saying that we can put together the Newton's second law with Einstein's famous equation, but we can't, for in the first acceleration is variable and mass is constant, and in the second light's speed is constant and mass is variable. Preciselly the reason that Einstein's 1905 work is there was to the problem between Newton and Maxwell, neglecting the first.

	(#10 (permalink))
Guille The Thinker Status: Offline Posts: 3,278 Thanks Given: 14 Thanked 9x in 9 Posts Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 47	01-09-2006, 02:51 PM Duane, About your three questions post: 1. It is NOT possible to create or destroy energy, we can only converse it into different types. If you can think of an example or experiment to proof otherwise, state it. Nothing you've wrote does so. 2. It is NOT possible to do any work without energy (or energy source). Because in order to apply a force at a distance (this is the physical and mathematical description of work) you must have a previous energy. 3. Gravity is a force, as are the other three fundamental forces: Strong Nuclear, Weak Nuclear, and ElectroMagnetic. All of these forces impply energy, not vice versa (if there is force there must be energy, but if the is energy, force is not neccesarilly there). Nevertheless, discussion about your theory is not possible because it is wrong from the start idea that relativistic mass is the same as rest mass. It's just as saying that we can put together the Newton's second law with Einstein's famous equation, but we can't, for in the first acceleration is variable and mass is constant, and in the second light's speed is constant and mass is variable. Preciselly the reason that Einstein's 1905 work is there was to the problem between Newton and Maxwell, neglecting the first.