| Upon further investigation (and reading the thread over) I believe there is no paradox. The paradox is based on the idea that an entity could create something, in the reality/universe/Everything this theory seeks to explain, just by conceiving it. An entity with such an ability would not only have the ability to mess with the theory, it would have the ability to undo or change all we know to be true. In that case there would be no concern that the theory was fallible since it wouldn't matter at that point; nothing could really be predicted.
Just because a person thinks "there is a disproof for this theory" it doesn't mean they create it. The concept, or idea, of a disproof exists but an item that can affect the theory does not.
Does that make sense? |