| direction of spinning If we call free fall of solid body to the center of planet balance-saving, also expending of light with the speed of 300 000km/sec. balance-saving, as well, then which from below variants of spinning would be more balance-saving? Please revise the post #15 of this thread (the second variant in aniomation, when the space bubles of atoms are touching each-other with their outer parts) about ideal theoretical situations of two bodies, conventionally called atoms, i.e. let’s imagine that the universe consists of only two elementary particles, called conventionally by us atoms (spinning ones, in this particular example) There are three pairs shown below: A and B – atoms’ axes are placed along the same line (A - spinning in one direction; B – spinning in different directions: in both cases atoms’ spaces touch each-other with polal parts). C and E - atoms’ axes are placed on parallel planes, i.e. their space bubbles touch each-other with equatoral parts. D and F - atoms’ axes are placed on perpendicular to each-other planes , i.e. the polar part of one's space bubble is touching the equatoral part of another. Keep in mind told in the previous post that attractive capability of the heavenly body’s space bubble (of its outer part) is most on the poles and least – on the equator. Blue lines – space boundaries (i.e. the line, which shows the amount of ultimate points of spreading of particular space bubble); Gray colored ovals are considered as atoms (or heavenly bodies). P.s. here are considered only basic variants (axes dispositions’ static examples), and only given examples of phases. Please don’t generalize it meanwhile. |