Quote:
|
Originally Posted by <<>> Dustin,
Something I find very paradoxical is that non-existence or non-existing things should actually simply not-exist, not even be non-existence for the are not there, but in contrary, what really happens, is that non-existence exists (paradox 1) in existence (paradox 2) as what doesn't exist (paradox 3) in it (paradox 4), non-existence exists (paradox 5) in non-existence (paradox 6) as all that exists (paradox 7) in it (the non-existence) (paradox 8 ), and non-existence exists (paradox 9) in reality (the set of all existences) (paradox 10) as that which doesn't exist (paradox 11) in all that exists (paradox 12) but exists (paradox 13) as everything in non-existence (paradox 14).
Crazy, but true. |
Non-existing things simply don't exist, this is true. However, the idea or concept of non-existing things does exist. The real question is can we find a non-existing thing that has the properties of existence? Can we find an item (or any number of items) that meets the criteria for non-existence as well as existence?