Quote:
|
Until a classical objective interpretation can be found, science will continue to wander into the realms of subjective fantasies created by the abstract nature of the mathematics.
|
Good point. Coincidentally, I just said as much to Michelle in the "When will the Theory of Everything be Solved" discussion.
Quote:
|
I am not certain of your comments of "String Theory", are you saying you support it or do you oppose it?
|
For lack of anything else approaching the most fundamental construct of reality I support it mainly because it is the 'science of the day' if for no other reason and it's fun to play with. Anything else we suggest to replace it is no more provable but I am more than willing to listen. Only, it has to make logical sense, and set the stage for greater insight.
Quote:
|
I personally oppose M-theory since it has been hyped without any means of supporting evidence.
|
No argument from me there. But then, what possible supporting evidence could there be for anything that would replace it? The following link is a tongue in cheek look at the actual depth that theoretical physicists will go to avoid scrutiny. I'll bet they feel perfectly secure with string theory. (You may already have seen this).