[baudrunner]

Is the longest wavelength, lowest frequence wave the echo of cavity resonance from periphery to periphery of the Universe? Is there a swell when reinforcement of the echoes sums their amplitude? What is the duration and frequency of this ultra-extreme low-frequency swell?

M-theory is an accommodation to the need to establish waves at the most fundamental level, that of the first elementary particles. Since energy is proportional to frequency they would represent the most energetic product of the most minute source, capable of maintaining, for the purpose of our dicussion, spatial definition for infinity. I see no reason why EM-theory should not co-exist with M-theory, or supplement it. For that matter, why not treat them both equally?

I am still a little perturbed that there is a stubborness to accept light propagation theory as I've described it. It doesn't contradict M- or EM- theory. I just find it illogical to accept that photons travel at light speed when Einsteinian relativity theory tells us that anything that travels at light speed has infinite mass and exists in a place where time stands still. I find it more acceptable to view the medium wherein light is propagated to be filled with static components that resonate rather than force particles that streak about colliding with our retinas. Besides, it's just so much more elegant. I could never find a proper explanation for how photons "light things up".

I know it is difficult to reconcile "long wavelength photons" with resonating atoms, but again a couple of explanations make one feel more comfortable with the idea.

A light source can generate a specific frequency of light at different wavelengths. The amount of energy per unit of time represented by n1 oscillations of frequency v1 over 1 cm is greater than that represented by n1 oscillations of frequency v1 over 1 meter (quantum electro-magneto-dynamics?). Also, different wavelengths of the same frequency agree both with M- and EM- theory in that they occur naturally by way of positive wave reinforcement, ie. summing of any two waves propagating in the same direction, ie. swelling.

As to how they create matter may be related to generation of mass by spin velocity, a "spin-off" of relativity. Spatial density as I see it is relative. I mean it is relative to our perception of it when viewed from within the context of our own being. It is most probable (pro-babble?) that matter and space are highly constrained by crowding of energy/force/matter, highly stressed, that there is no "empty space" at all.

Gee, Dave, you've got me going too. Antonio is wondering something along the same lines, how quantum reality determines the structure of DNA just so, to produce genes that determine the nature of life etc. Back to my Anthropic Principle, "...if it were any other way then that is the way that it would be, and there would still be somebody there to observe it".