Theory of Everything - View Single Post

Guille · 01-16-2006, 06:49 AM

Baud,

I didn't mean newton-maxwell to displace relativity-qm. Einstein developed SR to solve the fights N-M. 10 years later he developed GR to solve the problem SR-N (for SR had decided M was correct in the previous fight). Then we have GR-QM. But this problem has no slution, if it only took 10 years to solve the two biggest problems in physics until then to Einstein, how can it take 80 years and still not done to all the physicists? Their looking at the wrong problem. So we should just re-formulate GR math by developing a better result from classical physics and SR's interpretation and derivations from M, and all this done by knwoing that our result shoudl be combatible with QM. A new GR easy to unify with QM is a much more convincing idea than curent GR and QM unified.

	(#10 (permalink))
Guille The Thinker Status: Offline Posts: 3,278 Thanks Given: 14 Thanked 9x in 9 Posts Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 47	01-16-2006, 06:49 AM Baud, I didn't mean newton-maxwell to displace relativity-qm. Einstein developed SR to solve the fights N-M. 10 years later he developed GR to solve the problem SR-N (for SR had decided M was correct in the previous fight). Then we have GR-QM. But this problem has no slution, if it only took 10 years to solve the two biggest problems in physics until then to Einstein, how can it take 80 years and still not done to all the physicists? Their looking at the wrong problem. So we should just re-formulate GR math by developing a better result from classical physics and SR's interpretation and derivations from M, and all this done by knwoing that our result shoudl be combatible with QM. A new GR easy to unify with QM is a much more convincing idea than curent GR and QM unified.