Quote:
|
Originally Posted by subversion what the hell is spec motion?
anyway, I would like to reply to this quote, which refers to any two seperate objects
ahhh, this is a good argument, but you are ignoring one thing. If there is NEVER nothing in between them, this means that there is ALWAYS something. But the problem is this means the universe would have to be infinitely dense. WE know that the universe is not infinitely dense, therefore it must be composed partially of empty space, and partially of matter. Therefore in order for gravity to be far reaching it must have the ability to propagate through empty space because space is not completely full, or else it would have to be infinitely dense. SO I have just proven logically that empty space MUST exist or else the universe would be infinitely dense which it is not. This should be obvious, so please either agree that this is correct or try to disprove it again so that we can figure out who's right and eventually reach an agreement.
SubVersion!!!!!!! |
Understand me. What I mean is that either the empty space is very small, or it is jsut the space in between the necleuses of the atoms. Of course there is not always something, for that would be total density. Nevertheless, there is no true vacuum, that is, no place without matter, energy and force, for that place would not exist. I draw it like this:
Force<--Energy<--Matter-->Space-->Time
That is, Matter is the fundamental start of existence, but it can only exist with the other four, but allways there is matter, there are the other four. First, matter implies energy and space directly, for they are somehow more united to it, and these derive respectivelly force and time. But these two are also neccesary for existence. The five concepts make up the Pentagon Pillars Of Nature (2P-ON. phonetically written, this is 'To Be ON', TBON. Which could also mean: Theoretic Breakthrough On Nature).