Quote:
|
Originally Posted by <<>> Understand me. What I mean is that either the empty space is very small, or it is jsut the space in between the necleuses of the atoms. Of course there is not always something, for that would be total density. Nevertheless, there is no true vacuum, that is, no place without matter, energy and force, for that place would not exist. I draw it like this:
Force<--Energy<--Matter-->Space-->Time
That is, Matter is the fundamental start of existence, but it can only exist with the other four, but allways there is matter, there are the other four. First, matter implies energy and space directly, for they are somehow more united to it, and these derive respectivelly force and time. But these two are also neccesary for existence. The five concepts make up the Pentagon Pillars Of Nature (2P-ON. phonetically written, this is 'To Be ON', TBON. Which could also mean: Theoretic Breakthrough On Nature). |
Alright, so we agree that matter is not everywhere or else the universe would have to be infinitely dense. Well that proves right there that the force of gravity has to propagate through empty space: since gravity reaches everywhere, it will always encounter empty space no matter how small because empty space is invariably everywhere for the universe's composition to not be infinitely dense. True, force can still pass through empty space, thus empty space can be transmitting force, but that's just what I'm saying that true force propagates through empty space. You contradict yourself when you say the universe is not infinitely dense and then go on to say that there is no place without matter. Don't you agree?