[baudrunner]

Hi, Marko!

Thanks for giving the post your attention Marko, and welcome. We need more good heads to instill some sense into these discussions.

What do you think about the Multiverse theory? This could explain lot of things.

My thoughts on the Multiverse theory are well known to some of the regular posters. In short, I am a practical thinker. I will accept m-theory as representative of the common beginning for all of the different manifestations of energy if for the idea alone, and then throw in a little of divlewing's wave convergence/reinforcement theory whereby we may be able to describe the quantum niches that are encountered by the various conformations and interactions of those vibrating strings to produce all the force and matter particles which give rise to reality as we know it. Having said that, the Multiverse theory becomes implausible and impractical. All the Universes that could be realized must then also be here, in limited number no doubt, not in imaginary realms which subscribe to rules of physics different from what we know and from each other because they can't in any practical sense, but in forms we perhaps do not understand but can yet access. You see, each of those quantum niches represent a composite of multi-wave string resonance which have encountered threshold energies where their organisation can be maintained in time, through their creation of a loci wherein a spec motion is displayed and which contribute to mass and time through velocity. The different thresholds are represented by discrete particles which further encounter additional organisation into the elements, which in turn encounter further organisation into life, the reason for which I have discussed in part one of my TOE. This is the only way that it happened, and that it could have happened. Mathematics does not prove anything. It can easily be used to explain untruths, as evidenced by Einstein's static Universe theory. I'm afraid that this Universe is the only one that exists. In my posts on Particle and String Fundamentals I provide links to the Fermilab site wherein it is stated that the existence of other dimensions has never been proved and no evidence exists of them. it's all just math, Marko.

I dont want to draw any premature conclusions,so I will again ask you a question: Is your theory based on the mind-body dualism, or you see them as different manifestation of the same thing? Also, I would like to hear what do you think about the afterlife? In your theory, is there reincarnation,pure consciousness or nothing after we die?

My theory is based on experience and deep insight. I realize that the entire scope of existence encapsulated by the Universe is not representative only of what we feel and see before us. We life forms in this physical realm occupy a narrow band in the entire spectrum of existence.

I believe that God existed once as you and I, perhaps a billion or more years ago, and you will read this in another post of mine. I see that this physical realm is not of His creation but that His realm is a deconstruction of this one, and where all the energies that comprise the corporeal, which gave us the opportunity to evolve the spirit as a higher state of existence and which is a legitimate part of the "Universal Unconscious" whose manifestation is a predisposition to the grand idea that begat it all, was separated from those minimal amount of energies required to sustain the unique identity of the individual self. In a few hundred million years we might very well develop the technologies required to achieve that.

Our belief structure has imposed, perhaps subconsciously, a type of qualification ritual related to religion etc. whereby we are required to be qualified to enter that spiritual domain. It is true that matters pertaining to the physical have no equivalent in that realm so an adjustment of our way of thinking is genuinely required before we divest ourselves of our corporeality. I believe that transmigration of the spirit, ie. reincarnation, is a fact of life, but not a given for all who are alive. I like to remind people that we may all share the same reality but we do not necessarily all live on the same plane. We have to be aware of the potential before we can attain it.

To summarize, insomuch as there exists a spiritual realm, one might call it another dimension or another Universe, but in reality everything occupies the same Universe. We just have to learn to look beyond the obvious. It is quite conceivable that that which comprise the spiritual realm are pure subharmonics of those quantum niches of which we are made, or, we might represent those subharmonics and that spiritual realm the pure resonant essence of the fundamental. Either way, it would have had the same beginning.