Quote:
|
Originally Posted by <<>> 4. I can explain nature without the need of the idea of god. |
I'm going to try to disprove your proof if that's cool. Ok, I'm not saying I believe in god. If you can explain nature without the need of god then please explain to me EXACTLY how life arose from non-life on planet earth. Furthermore, I would like you to do an experiment which recreates life in the laboratory from non-life in order to prove your hypothesis, since you are a scientist. That's of course assuming you're a scientist which you have to be if you don't believe in god. So if you can explain nature without the need for god, you must explain how life started and you must recreate it in a lab.
Now I will use this to propose my proof that you cannot prove god doesn't exist. To prove god doesn't exist you must be able to explain how life started, and to prove that your explaination is correct you must recreate life in a laboratory. But by recreating life in a laboratory you are essentially proving that we could have been created by other beings in some setting or another. Therefore in trying to disprove god you'll end up proving that we could have been created by other beings, which is the notion of god if you will.