Quote:
|
Originally Posted by subversion but physically speaking you belong to yourself. Do you physically exist inside somebody else? No, you physically exist inside yourself. You know what I'm talking about |
I know, and I believe Michelle also knows, what you mean. But it's simply not like that. Now please I don't want to keep on this absurd discussion, if you want carry it on in your thread, but I want to centre my thread in the theme.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by subversion Yes Guille, but the reason the paradox comes about is because set theory does not understand that any set, in order to exist, is the zeroth member of itself. duh |
Yes, sub... Sure, sub... True, sub... That's what you want to read, well sorry it won't come deliberate. It will come if it's merit, if you earn it, and I see no reason yet to believe I should give it to you... All you want to see in my reply to your post is really what you say, you never ask for answers, you only ask for your answer, which anyway you know... You want me to tell you simply that Russell, Whitehead, Hilbert and even Godel were wrong, and that you are right. Well I tell you not to want so many things, not to espect so much of the world, and you will have so many things, the world will feel to have given you too much to you...