Theory of Everything - View Single Post

AntonioLao · **who are (were) the Einsteinians? -** 01-30-2006, 01:33 PM

Einsteinians are (were) the closet absolutists disguised publicly as relativists of both special and general theory. The notable ones not in any order or nationality but whatever first comes to mind are: Sir Arthur Eddington, Friedmann, Lemaitre, Hubble, Scharzchild, Gamow, Hoyle, TinyTree, Lanczos, Synge, and whoever wrote textbooks about relativity theories in order to discuss what in their mind believed in was really all about the unchanging things.

The ultimate symbols of absoluteness are the black holes and the mother of all black holes is the one and only one big bang singularity.

What about the living Einsteinians? Not in the habit of naming names, they should know who they are. They kept asking themselves why the universe should possess a beginning in time or in space. Some asked why the universe should continue existing in an absolute state without a beginning or end. They started with many courses of action then reached 3 then 2 then finally 1. They tried to measure infinity armed only with a single zero-point and when they wanted more and reached into their pockets full of mathematical tricks they came up empty-handed, emptier than what they always thought space and time were empty. They failed to realize that it was really their empty mind working overtime trapped in an infinite loop to which not even the most powerful supercomputer can get out of. Yet they kept feeding these superbly stubborn machines with more power crunching out one more decimal place for the number p or printing the next prime adding to the list of millions they got if not just to keep cryptographers busy but refusing to accept in their hearts that if they just put the gear in reverse they arrived back at the one and only prime whose birthright they denied since they learned how to add 1+1=2. They real problem is that they ought to explain to the general public who toiled long and hard keeping these monolithic machines running smoothly that why is 1-1=0?

	(#1 (permalink))
AntonioLao Raider of the lost time Status: Offline Posts: 5,308 Thanks Given: 724 Thanked 123x in 121 Posts Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 74	who are (were) the Einsteinians? - 01-30-2006, 01:33 PM Einsteinians are (were) the closet absolutists disguised publicly as relativists of both special and general theory. The notable ones not in any order or nationality but whatever first comes to mind are: Sir Arthur Eddington, Friedmann, Lemaitre, Hubble, Scharzchild, Gamow, Hoyle, TinyTree, Lanczos, Synge, and whoever wrote textbooks about relativity theories in order to discuss what in their mind believed in was really all about the unchanging things. The ultimate symbols of absoluteness are the black holes and the mother of all black holes is the one and only one big bang singularity. What about the living Einsteinians? Not in the habit of naming names, they should know who they are. They kept asking themselves why the universe should possess a beginning in time or in space. Some asked why the universe should continue existing in an absolute state without a beginning or end. They started with many courses of action then reached 3 then 2 then finally 1. They tried to measure infinity armed only with a single zero-point and when they wanted more and reached into their pockets full of mathematical tricks they came up empty-handed, emptier than what they always thought space and time were empty. They failed to realize that it was really their empty mind working overtime trapped in an infinite loop to which not even the most powerful supercomputer can get out of. Yet they kept feeding these superbly stubborn machines with more power crunching out one more decimal place for the number p or printing the next prime adding to the list of millions they got if not just to keep cryptographers busy but refusing to accept in their hearts that if they just put the gear in reverse they arrived back at the one and only prime whose birthright they denied since they learned how to add 1+1=2. They real problem is that they ought to explain to the general public who toiled long and hard keeping these monolithic machines running smoothly that why is 1-1=0? Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²