[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by humanbydefault

Part I.

There is no argue about the fact that humankind has gone a long way into the secrets of matter and the universe in general. However it's no secret either that as we [science] keep[s] a steady progress in many fields related to physics we still find ourselves in troubble when it comes to explain to ourselves and to others what's really "going on" inside matter.
If we go deep into those subjects physics find itself in crisis to justify or even explain we are "pushed back" to the same old and endless arguings between Bohr and Einstein all over again.
I've had the opportunity in the past to express myself here some of the views that I personally feel important to create some sort of a bridge, more like a "way through" to avoid falling into some of the absurd conclusions we are acostumed to hear and read in some very popular books these days...
For many those early concerns Einstein manifested all his life and in public are a thing of the past. There is [in my own opinion] a huge incompatibility between the concepts that physics stand today, namely: The theory of particles and the duality wave-particle when it comes to the nature of matter.
Einstein was right about the absence of logic and common sense those concepts above mentioned characterized themselves and their failure to describe reality but not in the way he proclaimed.
I have prepared for those interested in hear what I have to say a serie of discussions with some of those "puzzles" physics hasn't been able to properly explain. I'll guide you into a imaginary analysis [in theoretical terms] over those phenomena and I'll will use no math and no deep equation to that end. I'll relay entirely in your own arsenal of logic and common sense which is more than enough to me.
We have grown hearing about magnets. We all have a vague idea of what a magnetic field look like when the image of those iron skirls and their elliptical shape bump into our memory. Scientists has explain its existence by telling you that electrons have two spin [up and down] and that such effect "add up" in space forming a magnetic field. That's true, however they have missed to evaluate the consequences of such observation under the "theoretical microscope."
I wrote an article some time ago [half facts half fiction] titled "Between the devil and the deep blue sea." I atempted to describe with simple words what I saw then as lines of force around a magnet. I said then that atomic orbits were not filled with little tiny particles with the name of electrons, but by the complex structure of harmonics "projected" from the very core of the atom and its nucleus.
Perhaps many of you didn't realize what I meant to say then with "projected harmonics" and that is the KEY to understand what is going on with those violations observed today concerning the "Pauli Exclusion Principle."
Scientists [physicists, chemists and others in general] assume that an atom is made by a [unknown] collection of particles of different sizes among them we find quarks, protons, and electrons among the most populars. They affirm that an atom follows a principle that states that electrons will occupy their place around the nucleus according to a simple little formula: such little equation increase the number of "particles with negative charge" (electrons) as we give "n" a different value, 2,3,4, and so on.
The first problem [the first squeleton in quantum mechanics closet as I depicted in the past] was the actual [physical] size of ATOMS. You see, if we were to apply that little equation in the hydrogen atom we won't find any problem, however once the analysis was extended to include bigger size-atoms things don't work the same way! Atoms in nature extend from 1-3 armstrong... Excuse moi if I had spelling problems with the unit... Anyway!
my point [THE POINT ACTUALLY] is that we were to consider an automatic application of Pauli's Principle we would have atoms with twice and even bigger sizes that those found in the REAL WORLD.
Now! let's try to bring to our analysis the concept of harmonics. According to me, those harmonics were the projection of bonds produced in deeper levels in the atomic core and never ever a simple collection of electroinc orbits with a structure of their own. So, think about this for a moment!
A magnet showed us [as human beings -observers] that spin and magnetic force from each individual molecules and atoms were able to ADD-UP according to their spatial orientation [spin] creating a physically real spectrum across space. Magnetic fields are not the mere present of individual particles nor the coagulation of those but the vectorial [mathematical] result of the energy and directionality of the spin of that energy in space after their mutual RESOLUTION. Magnetism is a beautiful solution of energy in a life interaction, mass as "integral part of particles" are a ballast that no one could deal with if our analysis is correct.
I wonder... Isn't the origin of magnetism and its conclusive consequences a mirror image of what actually happens inside the atomic structure?
According to you, couldn't those orbits [they] have described filled with particles with wave capabilities nothing but projections and SOLUTIONS of energy in real interaction?

Harmonics is the key to unlocking many of the puzzles of creation,playthe right note,and all will be revealed.
kind regards michael.