Quote:
| Beyond a theory of knowledge is the insolvability of a duality between wave and particle nature of the universe. |
This insolvability whereof you speak is entirely related to a misconception of the true nature of reality and the misconstruence of its behaviour. I think that I explained the particle-wave duality issue rationally in my explanation of radiation in the optical spectrum in my TOE theory part VI. No empirical evidence has ever been provided that contradicts it. In fact, all the experiments ever done to examine the behaviour of light are supported by it. Just because I don't have a PhD behind my name does not automatically make me wrong. When atoms are agitated or excited they oscillate and influence adjacent atoms to do the same through like polar repulsion. The wave behaviour of this chain reaction is similar to the wave behaviour of water. It's simple. Where light is concerned, discrete quanta of photonics are made apparent by every half cycle of oscillation of each atom. They exist for the briefest instant and don't actually go anywhere. The process continues until the source of the energy of excitation is removed.
Now I consider this knowledge but you consider this theory. The definition of knowledge is contextual in nature, the context being the mind that establishes its definition. Something does not become general knowledge until it is accepted by the entire community.