Theory of Everything - View Single Post

humanbydefault · **"WHAT MIGHT HAVE..." PART III -** 02-14-2006, 12:28 PM

Part III.
The Pauli Exclusion Principle holds its value as principle ONLY WHEN IT COMES TO ANALYZE SIMPLE ATOMS [hydrogen for example]. We have talk about the TRANSFORMATION taking place every time two harmonics interact in space, as the case with two atoms in a molecule or molecules in a crystal. It shouldn't be a surprise to expect that as more complex crystals are formed in nature such resulting structure will adapt its shape into a new one [a new reality remember?]. However! It worths mentioning that such "new reality" we may observe with our instruments in every measurement process is still possible THANKS to the existence of two primary ones in their own interactive pattern.
Tell me honestly: Now that we have discussed the true nature of atomic orbitals and their "volatil" [I would say: "mutating"] NATURE OF THEIR ORIGIN...
Are we ready to answer to those professors that could not explain why atoms are shorter than "they should be" that the very reason for such REALITY has nothing to do with an "ASSUMED INCREASE IN THE ATTRACTION OF PROTONS OVER THEIR "puppets" ELECTRONS"?
Yes my dear friend! AGAIN! Do not relay in my words... Take a "good book in quantum mechanics" [if you could find one] and see for yourself what I'm trying to communicate here... please!
"...an assumed increase in the nucleus attraction over the outermost electroinc orbits..." JAJAJAJAJA...Sorry! couldn't hold it!
You see, they offer no REASONS for such convenient change in overall force... LADIES AND GENTLEMEN THIS IS THE SECOND SQUELETON I FOUND INSIDE QUANTUM MECHANICS CLOSET... OH! but there are more!
Then the question of DECAY! Great, we know atoms decay [Id better say "neutrons" decay, it sounds more reasonable]. But you see! Neutrons are supposed to be PARTICLES also, well I'll keep you posted of any changes in their status, but so far they are particles indeed and they decay...OH YES! they do! But how come neutrons [as particles] have the arrogance to decay when their "partners" protons don't!
YOU GOT IT RIGHT! Another squeleton inside the dirty closet, and you know what? this one smells pretty bad!
Neutrons, my good friends, are those new realities born after two primary energies [harmonics] bond! Use your common sense for a second here!
Once the bond cease to exist [two quarks levels of spinning energy...no particles please!] what's left?
a phenomenon conducting to a separation of two energies and the scattering of a left over incapable of keeping them bond together into a new configuration... see it inside your mind... try it! I know you will!
I know what you're thinking! Alpha particle scatterings... Am I right? Well that's the 4th smelly squeleton we dig out of that closet of theirs.
The theory was brilliant, but it was flawed! There was no tunneling throughout the nucleus of the atom into the ground state and to the vacuum... Sorry professor Gamow! Alpha particles [HELIUM] is the perfect configuration of energy symmetry in the entire universe! It has "no place to be grasped" by any other harmonic pattern nearby. It doesn't mean that HELIUM is not going to keep with the decay process later on, it means that a bond between two primary energies reached a "moment" of perfect balance between spins... I'd say a temporary ZERO as I have explained its true nature in the quantum era. After a simple decay an alpha particle is formed inside the atomic nucleus and since there is nothing to grasp in order to hold its position inside the atomic structure it simple scatter itself from there.
Of course if you read prof. Gamow's work, you'll probably find a bedstory about the way the alpha particle got it's wings... meanning got back their electrons.
Remember what I said about the true nature of electrons? I bet you do! Anyway! they are not and never were particles at all, they are the spatial projection of energies interacting at a deeper level. A new reality [remeber?] orbitals PROJECTED as a consequence of a "spreading" of energy across space. The same high energy found closer to the atomic core that is being REDUCED in density as we increase the distance from the center, an energy that decreases its magnitude obeyng the INVERSE OF THE SQUARE FUNCTION.
In my next part I'll talk a little bit about the secret of why we "see" electrons with equal values when measured in the vacuum and why we were missled by it more than hundred years ago and still today.
HUMANBYDEFAULT WWW.HUMANBYDEFAULT.COM
See you soon!

	(#4 (permalink))
humanbydefault 2nd degree Black Belt Status: Offline Posts: 328 Thanks Given: 2 Thanked 18x in 14 Posts Join Date: Jun 2005 Rep Power: 16	"WHAT MIGHT HAVE..." PART III - 02-14-2006, 12:28 PM Part III. The Pauli Exclusion Principle holds its value as principle ONLY WHEN IT COMES TO ANALYZE SIMPLE ATOMS [hydrogen for example]. We have talk about the TRANSFORMATION taking place every time two harmonics interact in space, as the case with two atoms in a molecule or molecules in a crystal. It shouldn't be a surprise to expect that as more complex crystals are formed in nature such resulting structure will adapt its shape into a new one [a new reality remember?]. However! It worths mentioning that such "new reality" we may observe with our instruments in every measurement process is still possible THANKS to the existence of two primary ones in their own interactive pattern. Tell me honestly: Now that we have discussed the true nature of atomic orbitals and their "volatil" [I would say: "mutating"] NATURE OF THEIR ORIGIN... Are we ready to answer to those professors that could not explain why atoms are shorter than "they should be" that the very reason for such REALITY has nothing to do with an "ASSUMED INCREASE IN THE ATTRACTION OF PROTONS OVER THEIR "puppets" ELECTRONS"? Yes my dear friend! AGAIN! Do not relay in my words... Take a "good book in quantum mechanics" [if you could find one] and see for yourself what I'm trying to communicate here... please! "...an assumed increase in the nucleus attraction over the outermost electroinc orbits..." JAJAJAJAJA...Sorry! couldn't hold it! You see, they offer no REASONS for such convenient change in overall force... LADIES AND GENTLEMEN THIS IS THE SECOND SQUELETON I FOUND INSIDE QUANTUM MECHANICS CLOSET... OH! but there are more! Then the question of DECAY! Great, we know atoms decay [Id better say "neutrons" decay, it sounds more reasonable]. But you see! Neutrons are supposed to be PARTICLES also, well I'll keep you posted of any changes in their status, but so far they are particles indeed and they decay...OH YES! they do! But how come neutrons [as particles] have the arrogance to decay when their "partners" protons don't! YOU GOT IT RIGHT! Another squeleton inside the dirty closet, and you know what? this one smells pretty bad! Neutrons, my good friends, are those new realities born after two primary energies [harmonics] bond! Use your common sense for a second here! Once the bond cease to exist [two quarks levels of spinning energy...no particles please!] what's left? a phenomenon conducting to a separation of two energies and the scattering of a left over incapable of keeping them bond together into a new configuration... see it inside your mind... try it! I know you will! I know what you're thinking! Alpha particle scatterings... Am I right? Well that's the 4th smelly squeleton we dig out of that closet of theirs. The theory was brilliant, but it was flawed! There was no tunneling throughout the nucleus of the atom into the ground state and to the vacuum... Sorry professor Gamow! Alpha particles [HELIUM] is the perfect configuration of energy symmetry in the entire universe! It has "no place to be grasped" by any other harmonic pattern nearby. It doesn't mean that HELIUM is not going to keep with the decay process later on, it means that a bond between two primary energies reached a "moment" of perfect balance between spins... I'd say a temporary ZERO as I have explained its true nature in the quantum era. After a simple decay an alpha particle is formed inside the atomic nucleus and since there is nothing to grasp in order to hold its position inside the atomic structure it simple scatter itself from there. Of course if you read prof. Gamow's work, you'll probably find a bedstory about the way the alpha particle got it's wings... meanning got back their electrons. Remember what I said about the true nature of electrons? I bet you do! Anyway! they are not and never were particles at all, they are the spatial projection of energies interacting at a deeper level. A new reality [remeber?] orbitals PROJECTED as a consequence of a "spreading" of energy across space. The same high energy found closer to the atomic core that is being REDUCED in density as we increase the distance from the center, an energy that decreases its magnitude obeyng the INVERSE OF THE SQUARE FUNCTION. In my next part I'll talk a little bit about the secret of why we "see" electrons with equal values when measured in the vacuum and why we were missled by it more than hundred years ago and still today. HUMANBYDEFAULT WWW.HUMANBYDEFAULT.COM See you soon!