Part IV
Is trully EMPTY that ample amount of space observed between atoms in certain material lately?
To answer that question and many others related I will talk to you about a very important feauture of our reality. Among the other questions we will answer today we will be able to EXPLAIN why magnets repel and attrack each other when close to one another.
I have mentioned to you that a HARMONIC [you may call it an orbit or orbital if you like...] could only rotate or spin in two ways: up and down or north or south... doesn't matter the nomenclature used really. The KEY question here is that according to the specific harmonic you refer a specific amount [magnitude] of energy in a specific density could be present, no more and no less energy and no more or less density. That explains why colors and tones [in sound] exist in a variety of forms. As a reminder I'd like to point out [once again] that the phenomenon called 'GROUND STATE' is a intermediate STEP along the vast harmonic scale across the atomic structure.
What does it mean? It means that what we defined as STABLE sub-atomic particles [protons, electrons, etc.] are nothing but SCALES and each scale holds its first "key" which is nothing more than its own GROUND STATE. I mentioned to you in the past that between scales [ground states] we find steps in a ladder or levels where "they" assume (even today) that "all-mighty electrons" keep JUMPING up and down in response to energy absorption... Got it so far?
Now! each and every STEP [including of course the ground state naturally] is limited by the magnitude of energy it can "hold" during spin. If you remember, the final energy present in a standing wave will be twice the amplitude of the two participating in the interference. This is the fact that determine the actual density of the energy involved in a given harmonic. The second factor is the directionality of the actual SPIN.
What's the secret? The secret is that as you couple two harmonics [spinning waves] with equal SPIN you will feel a repulsion between both! In the case the energy density of both were equal there would be no "permeability" across them either.
If the SPIN of bothe intercepting harmonics were opposite one another, it's easy to imagine that a sort of attraction will originate... But why?
Why atoms feel attracted to each other? Why magnets keep trying to join north poles with south ones?
I bet you are smart enough to find out the answer for yourselves!
Of course! It is the SOLUTION in space of both spins what determines such outcome. Spins are matched in a coupling adding up or cancelling each other out according to a simple rule: "the stronger will prevail." Two opposing SPIN systems will "give birth" to a resultant [third one] with the final net product of the "progenitors."
That's the reason the net energy of molecules are observed as more stable and in a lower energy state. That's why magnets joined together in the direction of attraction will stay together and resist any separation!
In other words what happened was that energy spinning in opposite directions will be accomodated inside the participant harmonics and that results in a more stable and "energy-saving mode" too.
Those same BONDING-OPERATIONS occur inside the atom too. The consequence is no difficult to imagine right? Electronic orbits will "COPY" what's really going on inside the very core of the atom. Electrons are not particles gentlemen, they are the SOLUTION of internal interference between deeper energies made to confront with opposite spin with the sole and final aim to achieve a lower state and stable status of net [overall] energy.
Those physicists working today in trying to dismissed the Pauli Exclusion Principle are far from understanding what's actually going on inside matter.
But please don't take my word for it! Do your little search in the net and see for yourselves!
Was Really EMPTY that space as they stated as a result of their observation?
YES! and NO! It feels empty to our measuring devices because nothing [nothing that we could observe] could occupy a place inside them. It's NOT EMPTY because what you think as plenty chance for your "electrons" to "hang around" is precisely the final SOLUTION! Those "electrons" unwilling to occupy that "empty space" is the ENERGY-SOLUTION of a different configuration. Once an event occur in certain materials given by their own coupling characteristics a different SOLUTION will be obtained!
This doesn't mean that a Principle IN PHYSICS HAS BEEN VIOLATED, it only means that a smart principle has been "mixed up" with a theory that has given a right to exist to "SUB-ATOMIC PARTICLES." And that's the dilemma!
Tell me something! How could you explain a DNA chain could unzziped if you wait for particles to "tunnel through" in a HOPE for empty spaces to go come across?
The old and classic mentality of "PARTICLES" is putting the advance in other fileds of science on hold! Not just physics! In biology the speed of such processses are almost instantaneous BECAUSE it takes NO TIME to large molecular chains to adopt into different SOLUTIONS once the medium requires them to do it.
Stop thinking in electrons jumping up and down from one orbit to another inside atoms! This is 2006! It's time to finally get ride of that metaphysical dogma and enter into a new vision of our universe... don't you think?
Don't let them [your physics professors I mean here] try to convince you about things even they couldn't find a plausible explanation!
Use you mind! project out your marvelous HUMAN imagination [I know you can if you decided to] and voice your opinion about this.
Albert Einstein was concerned about the true nature of reality. He was right but also wrong about the whole thing as I have come to understand all these years...
If it's true that reality [at different levels or scales inside matter is prone to changes and "mutations"] it is also TRUE that the "primary reasons" for such changes are not subject to disappear from the universe. Energy is eternal and it is in a permanent transformation whether we like it or not!
THE UNIVERSE WAS NOT CREATED OUT OF NOTHING! Quantum mechanics philosophy [I 'd rather say: metaphysical ideology instead] prophesing electrons and matter in general with the "magic ability" to simply "POPP OUT" out of nothingness is unacceptable for me and I hope for you too!
I admire professor Green's work and books but I totally disagree with him 100%. No offense but the so-called "inherent uncertainty" as a feature of quantum mechanics makes my stomach sick...
I have no problems voicing out my opinion, how about you?
I'm not looking for confrontations, do not missundestand me, I'm searching for the truth as we all here [I guess...] and I assure you one thing:
I'm closer to it than they are... join me in my effort! I'm sure you could have someone you could talk to and help change physics forever.
HUMANBYDEFAULT
Reference:
"Rediscovering the atomic model- part two"
http://www.toequest.com/forum/physics-articles/824-rediscovering-the-atomic-model-part-two.html
"Zero and it's true nature in the quantum era"
http://www.toequest.com/forum/mathematics/1403-zero-its-true-nature-the-quatum-era.html
"Between the devil and the deep blue sea"
http://www.toequest.com/forum/philosophy-articles/764-between-the-devil-the-deep-blue-sea.html