Quote:
|
Do you think or realize the first principle singularity, infinite space, would have had to create dark matter clouds as star nurseries to produce the first big-super-nova bang? I know you've mentioned many bangs, interesting. Any guess as to how many big-bangs, or was and is it just simply as the newest cosmological evidence shows - a continuous history of star nurseries and big-super-nova bangs, creating whole galaxies?
|
Just as you've postulated, an ongoing process of creation. The concept of a random quantum fluctuation yielding one Big Bang was always too simple an explanation to my mind. The actual process of creation is a little more subtle than that. To every effect there is a cause and the effect represents a logical result of that cause, that is why I suggested the premonition theory, because it predisposes the existence of life as manifesting the consciousness with which it is mutually contingent. It's a more rational explanation and as a matter of course more outlandish in circumspect, perhaps because it leaves no questions, and people are more comfortable with unresolved scenarios.
Quote:
|
So I take it you do have an optomist side. Yet above you stated; "It's as good as it gets." Now that is rather pessimistic. Which are you? Constancy is everything.
|
The "as good as it gets" statement referred specifically to the subject under discussion, ie. applied Keynesian economics. I am pessimistic as to the future of humankind but optimistic as to my place in the cosmic scheme of things. As to my constance, read my signature...