[humanbydefault]

If you look in any book on physics you'll find that along with the word "electron" there will read some well defined magnitudes. Mass, charge, and even size of the so-called particle will give you the first impression that you were dealing with a tiny piece of coherent material... a minuscle grain of rare substance with magical physical characteristics also capable of owing electrical and magnetical properties among many other weird and unexplained features [spin].
They will try to convince you that such tiny "grain" [of something they don't have a clue of what...] is being a part of every matter found in the universe. With the arrival of quantum mechanics a number of circus-type of incredible "acts" like suddenly appearing and vanishing out of a clean vacuum and out of nothing are part of an already fuzzy image of our "physical reality."
Such misinterpreted and dangerous conclusions have "inspired" others to sort of extend such incredible [and impossible] behavior to our existence and even to the origin of the universe. You know their names very well. I don't find pleausure in repeating their names and their backgrounds just to disagree with their theories... I simply disagree!
As I've done before here I'll ask you once again for your time, patience and common sense and nontheless your open mind and vivid imagination.
Wouldn't be logical to conclude that the circumstances the measurements of the electron and its physical properties took place [then and even today] were influenced by the conditions of the vacuum around those experiments?
What I'm trying you to see is that electrons [outside the atom] are nothing but a quantum of energy that have been scaterred just like photons were observed to be all the time. The vacuum imposes [by reasons I can't say because I don't know them] certain magnitude and density of E-M energy with a given electrical charge and magnetic spin that coincides with what we have called electrons more than hundred years ago.
I've said that inside the atomic structure that density and spin is determined by the actual interaction of high-energy speks of radiation at the core of the atom, the vacuum "supplies" mass to avoid the possible vacuum created every time confronting waves of energy [originated from those speks] collide with each other in the pattern of interference: standing nuclear waves.
I have asigned different density and magnitude of energy to each and every harmonic [level]. If external [incoming energy] was supplied into the atomic structure the is logical to believe that it will be TRASFORMED into a new quatum and expelled as a photon or as an electron.
How was the process possible? By the simple replacement of spinning mass for an incoming E-M energy into the harmonic. Mass would be forced [pusshed] to the inmidiate vacuum for a short lapse of time while the atomic oscillator "remodulated" the energy into a photon or an electron.
This conclusion [of mine] points toward a different view of electrons [outside the atom]. Those electrons scattered from the orbits were not part of those orbits at all! They were MANUFACTURED in site thanks to a previously supplied E-M energy! [just like photons are all the time].
The vacuum imposses a different rule once the process is taking place outside the atomic structure. The measured [and published] amount of charge, mass and size of electrons are being limited by the vacuum and every quantum of energy [produced by the depicted process] that "fits" those strict demands will be observed and measured as one electron... as simple as that!
Will electrons [as quantum of E-M energy "traveling" across the vacuum] be ever observed to have a different physical property? I mean,other that the one Dr. J.J. Thompson concluded in his experiments?
You know the answer better than me... NO WAY!
It doesn't mean that E-M energy across lattices of solids will all have the same physical "constants." To say such thing will be a contradiction to every thing I've proposed here and trully believe. The physical properties of those quanta that "travel" across materials [conductors,semiconductors etc] are determined by the actual SOLUTION we were talking about in my previous postings. The process of MANUFACTURE does not vary, it's the same in all cases, but the amount of E-M energy moving between molecules is always conditioned by the final structure of the material.
At this point I believe that we could "see" why the concept of tunneling [the way has been stated by physicists] is FLAWED!
If a quantum of E-M energy moves across a medium [vacuum, crystals etc] depending the reality it faces during the flow:
Could we dare to affirm that a given magnitude and density of energy [electro-magnetic in this case] that only FITS the limits of one harmonic could violate everything we know and go across a barrier with different set of limitations?
That will be an act of God and a true miracle! The problem is that science and the subjects it study] are not ruled by any of those arguments and I have to deny such stupidity with all my logic and common sense... no offense!
The answer is SIMPLE. For physicists and the rest of scientists for that matter ELECTRONS are the last frontier. There are no smaller PARTICLES in the universe that the one we decided to named LEPTONS. So, it means that if a lepton appears on the other side of the barrier then it has "tunneled across" it or else... Well, the answer is ELSE!
I propose that the reason we observed [as a fact] that somehow the magnitude of E-M energy equivalent of that of ONE ELECTRON were seen on the other side of the "barrier" had nothing to do with a miracle nor with "inherent uncertainties" based on "probabilities" but with a wrong view of reality by our part.
ELECTRONS ARE NOT THE LAST FRONTIER IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE ATOMS! The atomic structure expands even further in scales and one of those harmonics beyond of what we know today as electronic orbital were responsible for the MANUFACTURE of yet another electron.
But wait a second! Thisgs could be confusing here so let's go slowly!
We have said that the VACUUM imposses a limitation referred to the physical properties of "traveling quanta" then how could be possible that a quantum of E-M energy manufactured in a lower energy-density conditions will acquire a higher state?
It all depends on the right amount of energy supplied and TIME. Professor Konstatin Likharev proved that a tunneling wannabe electron made to jump between two plaques under streamly low temperature conditions were formed slowly across time. He compared the process with a leaky tap. As an electron was forming in one side of the plaque time was needed for it to acquire a specific magnitude of energy before the JUMP.
HE MEASURED THE JUMPING ELECTRON AND HE FOUND OUT THAT THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE TUNNELING ELECTRON WAS EXACTLY THAT KNOWN SINCE J.J. THOMPSON'S EXPERIMENTS.
In fact he was producing [manufacturing] what we call one electron in a lapse of time with the right supplied of energy! Can't you see this?
The problem is that when E-M energy moves across wires and semiconducting materials that CONDITION does not have to be met.
Allow me to repeat this in a different way: Current moves across materials in different harmonics, just as light moves across the air in different colors! There is no LEPTON with ONE physcial property at all!
Tunneling is the realization of a logical and common sensical process of nature and not a MIRACLE.

HUMANBYDEFAULT