Quote:
|
Originally Posted by baudrunner The constant creation of virtual particles in an ever-expanding space means that space is ever-changing, never static or permanent in form and dimension. |
Ah Baud, here you make that old logic mistake. You cannnot know what infinity is to the degree you mention, only that it exists, and a few other properties of, already mentioned. We can not know whether infinite space grows or not. To state what is known to be outside of logic, is unscientific, and unprovable... If I create a law of knowing, such law would require logic to have an unmoving now space to witness the moving from - time or motion. Where is the logical position you witness the moving and time change from, if not what I have stated?
appended to first post:
A Sensible Infinity
"The law of requirement - The only source of energy at the universal origin, to make conservation of energy/matter law true, was infinite space energy, to create first matter, therefore infinite space energy is required!" me
"The #1 law of impossibility - Finite matter cannot birth infinite space!" me
""The #1 law of infinity - A first singularity is required by deffinition to be infinite, as it is all there is!" me
"A law of Einstein's impossibility of time and motion observer - It is impossible for SR and GR to be completely true, with no stationary now space!" me
"The particle theory problem - The finite cannot produce the infinite!" me
"The arithmetic of spirit/energy physics - T.O.E. - May be a theory of one, that describes everything!" me
"The infinite void's energy waves?" me
Just a few more ideas to thrash around... Baud, do you see the problems with Einstein's SR and GR? The way I see it, the problem and solution to the T.O.E. is a purely intellectual one - untangle the confusion, and we have it. What do you think...?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick By nature,Nature will always look for balance,and will Always
select the most economical way of achieving this!
kind regards michael. |
Michael, I hope you don't mean by nature, all nature. Your statement I accept as true to nature outside of human nature, but absolutely not as pertains to humanity. Human nature, as a whole system, always maintains, supports and evolves into imbalances and major dis-equilibriums. Nature outside man is trying to resolve this with global resourse shortages, I agree, but is this nature truly looking for balance, or has man finally truly upset the balance of both natures...? To truly understand this, one must understand how Boolean, machine, computer logic is taking over human logic, on a global scale. We need a great awakening, soon!
The Imaginal True...
Absolutely true imagination is the superior functioner of mind in any T.O.E.
The function of imagination was put very succinctly and clearly in 1972 by Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kuk:
"The perception of ontological truth is dependent upon the development of the power of imagination, A SPECIAL NON-RATIONAL FACULTY ... [my emphasis], and
"In the treasury of imagination all truth and greatness are contained; these become manifest little by little through the restrictive, filtering channels of reason. Our rational faculty is but a humble disciple ... All praise is due to the vital force of our higher imagination ... which unites with the higher Reason.
"The Power of imagination is the `chair' of which the light of wisdom and of the higher life rest . . . The exalted state of imagination obtains as long as man adheres to the standards of holiness; secular imagination, on the other hand, contains only the reflected power of the shadow (of reason) and is the source of cynicism . . ."
Not that I agree with it all, but quite succinctly put.
Wave Structured Matter...
There doesn't seem to be anyone around, so I'll take a stab at answering your querry. In my logical way of achieving certainty of quantum mechanics, and wsm over cosmological space-time special relativity, I compared the absolute mathematical certainty of greatest magnitude infinity itself, to spact-time relativity's lack of mathematical infinity at all, in the large. Of course infinity, in the small, exists in all systems, but a greatest magnitude infinity only exists in non-space time absolute infinite space, i.e., the new quantum mechanics of wolff, mead, hawkings, lafreniere, haselhurst, myself and others, plus the wsm. It only takes doing the spact-time math of either 15 or 30 billion years of light speed travel to realize einstein's figures fall far short of greatest magnitude infinity. So if we eliminate the possibility of einstein having any cosmological space-time validity, we have more certainty, to start with - no cosmological space-time special relativity confusion. This in no way eliminates lorentz's quantum relativity - the only true relativity to begin with.
By my mind's logic, absolute greatest magnitude infinity makes far more sense than einstein's restricted cosmological curved space-time special relativity balloon, of false lesser than infinity mathematics. If we are going to accept logic as mathematical certainty, greatest magnitude infinity must be accepted as a corresponding mathematical certainty, only possible in wsm's new quantum infinite space reality. You can't have conflict in mathematics and achieve any certainty at all in formal logical systems. Most all formal higher order logic and mathematics systems either agree or correspond, not contradict. Einstein's cosmological space-time special relativity mathematics contradicts the highest order formal logic of greatest magnitude mathematics. Thus, einstein is wrong and wsm is right, as the only other serious mathematical reality left - a new logic of mathematical certainty - least and greatest magnitudes of infinity.
As to the laws of nature, physics and sciences, they really don't control anything, anyway. They are the evolving of space motion onward. They exist as descriptors of wave actions of motions. Even if I were to grant the validity of einstein's cosmological space-time special relativity, none of the natural laws would change at any velocity approaching the speed of light, even if such a foolish idea as speeding the earth were done, due to conspansion, all measuring tools, parallel lines, maths, etc., on and on would all shrink with inperceptable change to any theoretical observer. The reality of the observer, even in the shrinking rod scenario or clock scenario, is absolutely impossible due to conspansion - the fact that no observer at the cosmological level, under einstein quantifactions, can ever tell if that type of universe is going forward or back, or stable, shrinking, or expanding, or matter shrinking, nor can an observer ever exist at that level, even theoretically, without always viewing the same unchanging frame of reference. Not to be offensive, but quite a foolish false reality, if you ask me. So I suggest we accept the only sensible possible reality - wsm and true infinite and absolute space.
We have only one real choice, the false mathematics of special relativity einstein or the true greatest magnitude mathematics of infinity.
by L.A.Gillespie
Take away all the universe's heat, and you have the
real prime mover -
The Initial Super-Conductivity of A Quantum Radiating Singularity! Absolute zero temp creates the initial electric wave motion,
period - extreme pressure of infinite space, zero point energy! This is just a natural attribute of infinity.
regards