Quote:
|
My friend ifyou think that you understand the true natureof light,then I am the archbishop of Rome!
|
Well, you are not the archbishop of Rome (unless you are, in which case I apologize, your excellency), and (but) I do indeed understand the true nature of light, which fact you might appreciate had you the same level of understanding as do I. My ideas must at first be read, then digested and then understood before any attempt is made to critique them, and then a proper critique must of needs be a positive one, giving evidence of the higher level of understanding that compels you to refute my theory such that my own understanding might be enhanced. If then your entire critique consists of nothing more than a superfluous "My friend if you think that you understand the true nature of light,then I am the archbishop of Rome!", then all the kind regards in the world cannot justify your emission, unscientifically supported that it is.
Read, Michael. At least, try to understand. I do indeed understand the nature of light, for, such as it is, that is the way that it is.