[zeroca]

I almost fully share this opinion. What can I add?
The state, when omnipresent was alone, i.e. was “within itself”, didn’t last within time and there was no 3D space. How can we imagine such state? We can do it by imagining it as a single material point without measures, but alas! Our mind is restricted to imagine any phenomenon without bind it to 3D space (even completely empty one).
How long lasted such state of motionless?
As there wasn’t any change, so such state didn’t last inside time! – That’s to say such state didn’t take place within time (as time didn’t exist), and if there any kind of changes were expected, they were expected at once.
What kind of changes could happen within nothingness? I wouldn’t like to argue with anybody, but I believe that it was splitting of nothingness into two equal and opposite phenomena (or rather two mentioned kind of processes), as there wasn’t any other credibility within zero, and at present these born phenomena take place freely within 3D space and time,
A great part of people don’t believe such tale, but as for me I do!

Even my conclusion that if told by me above is right, so we have this motionless nothingness “at hand”, and there must be some mechanism to use it as a main regularity to ease the motion-full universe, and such system really exists and really works!!!!
Regards,
--Zeroca