| | |
| Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 80 | turbulent clinamen order -
02-23-2006, 12:45 PM
It was deeply established that turbulent flow is associated with the onset of chaotic nonlinear motion. This is 100% true on the global scale. However, it is 100% false at the local infinitesimal scale of space-time motion. Who invented the 1st set for three laws of motion? It is neither Kepler nor Newton. It is none other than Lucretius. See more about this prime mover at these sites http://www.londonconsortium.com/courses/MapstoneStoicsessay.pdf and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucretius and http://www.iep.utm.edu/l/lucretiu.htm Lucretian physics described the existence of an infinitesimal disturbance or clinamen (modern term should be analogous to quantum fluctuation) that gave rise to the physical complexity of the cosmos. Nonetheless, modern cosmology suggests that the Universe is predominantly composed of ordinary matter and energy: photons, electrons and their neutrinos, proton (uud), and neutron (udd). Their interactions create atoms, molecules, planets, stars, and galaxies. The other exotic elementary particles: antimatter, gravitons, Higgs bosons, magnetic monopoles, heavier quarks and leptons at the least can only be artificially created at the expense of extremely high energy inputs. Equivalently these high energy inputs match the high energy outputs necessary of the vacuum since the vacuum does not easily give up its infinite supply of ‘dead’ energy unless it gets back the same amount of ‘live’ energy as quickly as possible. Quantum mechanics describes how this is done in a nutshell as the uncertainty principle between the energy loan period Dt and the energy loan amount DE such that their product is great or equal to Planck’s constant h, that is Dt DE ≥ h. Nevertheless, in term of H+ and H- and their quantized degrees of freedom of space-time, the emergence of turbulently self-organized nonlinear chaotic yet orderly dissipative structures is realized. Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² |
|
| |