Thread
:
thingamegig and thingamebob?
View Single Post
(#
10
(
permalink
))
baudrunner
4th degree Black Belt
Status:
Offline
Posts: 586
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 37x in 34 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2005
Rep Power
: 17
02-23-2006, 08:31 PM
Oh, I see. So where ± = neutral, or equilibrium therefore ...
S
k
p(yin,yang) q(yang,yin) - q(yin,yang) p(yang,yin) = ± ...(?!?!?!)
but hang on, something's not right..
"
There is nothing permanent except change
"
baudrunner
View Public Profile
Send a private message to baudrunner
Visit baudrunner's homepage!
Find More Posts by baudrunner