Lets' put aside for a moment the fact that the way [most of us] see light in specific colors and frequencies has to do with our anatomy... I don't think that here [I mean in this forum] those who have a crush with philosophy would dare to state that light is a product of our "wild imagination..." just as the rest of nature. It would be a very hypnotic and self-convincing one since even measuring devices are capable of DETECTING, MEASURING and OBSERVING a type of energy called Electro-magnetic AMONG MANY MANY OTHERS...
So, let's put our minds and hearts to work with our imagination in the context of PHYSICS AND QUANTUM MECHANICS for the time being...shall we?
Besides, those spending their time in a bubble of words about an individually-fitting universe are not the ones in the news today... condensed matter and its marvelous technology is as solid and realistic as we are!
Did you get the title of this thread?
Let's repeat it for the pleasure of it:
Could we affirm that not until we have a full glass of water we couldn't calm our thirst or water a plant in the garden or wash our hands?
No one [thanks God for it!...] denies the "content" of light... not even you who reads this post, I hope! ELECTRO-MAGNETIC ENERGY...That's the name.
It's the same making for "electrons." Of corse some very smart guys with a great and DESERVED reputation [do not missread my words...] claim photons as "messenger particles" that sort of transfer energy between electrons... you know the rest I hope... If not get a book of QED and read all about it.
It makes perfect sense! A little quantity of "water" trasfer between two glasses WITH DIFFERENT VOLUME could mean something...!
In the vacuum "electrons" have all the same "volume" "water density" [charge] because the ether force them to, but inside crystals and lattices of solids the story is entirely different!
A little "drop" of "water" even if it is not enough to fullfil a glass of 8 onces could make a difference in the bonding [coupling] structure of molecules.
Einstein himself imagined that photons [UV high energy ones] would be able to "knock out" "electrons" from the atomic orbits...! Well I have said that things are not happening the same way and I came with another explanation about the same observed-conclusions. The point is that Einstein-milliken's lumps of E-M energy [photons] were the little portion of "water" needed to fill the atomic oscillator composed by my "electronless" harmonics.
We FRABICATE [sounds rude does it?] lets' say we produce electricity [current of charges across wires] with the help of magnetic fields and solar pannels that "capture" light from a star called Sun. In the first case E-M energy is much more dense and "glass-ready packed" in ether-electrons. In the second example E-M energy is weaker and will take time to it to manufacture electrons.
When I said MANUFACTURING ELECTRONS I didn't mean creating MATTER. Electrons (outside the atom) are [to me] just quanta of energy with a specific energy density that makes for what we knoW as the charge of ONE ELECTRON. In order to create MATTER we would have to be able to create the same energy found inside stars, put it together in a standing wave pattern of interaction with the size or magnitude of leptons... This doesn't sound like a present HUMAN technological possibility TO ME!
Is it a work only destined to be done by God? I tell you what: When I came to this forum I decided to write my views and revealing images in a scientific context. For me [as it was for Albert Einstein too who in fact was a very religious person by the way...] there is an OBJECTIVE REALITY OUT THERE!
I am part of that reality and I am trying to explain to myself [and to others interesting in hear me out] the answers (the way I see them) for those puzzles we face today in science. Theology was never my favorite and I tend to keep it that way... no offense to any one in this beautiful forum!
I just feel I had to clarify to some of you that this section of the forum is about quantum mechanics and not until we finally unveil the secrets of matter and the TOE, we should engage ourselves in guessing games about the participation of God in all this... It doesn't sound right.
There is a section about philosophy and paranormal stuff right here in this forum, I suggest to those highly motivated by that subject to visit them more often.
Anyway! I was saying that the fact that electrical current of charges can't be transported in a light ray it doesn't mean that the actual tapestry of lights is other than E-M energy and the same making for electrons.
The vacuum does not allow for charges other than electrons the way we have [wrongly] assumed as eternal and universal PARTICLES with some magic attributes like a mass holding charges and moving in a ficticious and virtual "wave function" as abstract as the human image of God.
The rules and laws of the ether [vacuum] are not omnipotent inside long chain of molecules! Light is a weaker form of the same energy found in electrons and the same one in so-called protons and so on! It's the actual density what makes them act differently... positive or negative? it was all a human-given conventionality to make since easier to represent in our equations.
HUMANBYDEFAULT
latest references of related topics:
http://www.toequest.com/forum/general-physics/1504-misguided-the-measurement-procedure.html http://www.toequest.com/forum/quantum-physics/1450-what-might-have-troubbled-einstein.html http://www.toequest.com/forum/physics-articles/824-rediscovering-the-atomic-model-part-two.html http://www.toequest.com/forum/quantum-physics/949-theoretical-clean-up-dirty-physics.html http://www.toequest.com/forum/quantum-physics/990-bose-einstein-condensate-same-matter-different-feeling.html http://www.toequest.com/forum/your-toe-theory/1039-oops-many-electrons-takes-right-professor.html