Quote:
|
Originally Posted by <<<GUILLE>>> A requierement is that you need to explain where all the energy of the universe came from? Of course, energy comes from force, and requiers force. But where is force from? Matter. And now one last thing, were is matter? In spacetime, in dimensions. Were are these dimensions, if there is nothing at all that exists? Nowhere. This is circular for it asumes the universe was empty first, but in that case, please someone who believes this give a good explanation of how the force of expansion started, and how does spacetime 'grow'? |
Let me be rude by delivering first the short answer: Good question, wrong format.
Here is the longer reply:
You are mixing up two sets of questions. One is "Where does our universe come from," the other is "How did our universe come into being?"
When asking where is the force from, the answer needs to either fit our universe's laws or the answer needs to clarify the beginning of those laws but does not fall under those laws itself. As you probably understand, I am not concerned with the question where matter came from; I do not see it as part and parcel - only as parcel - of Empty Nest.
The theory of Empty Nest is a spatial challenge about the set up of the laws of our universe; they do not necessarily have to fall under these laws - they need to explain them.
The question "Where is the force from?" is a question that fits our laws. It has been created with our laws in mind. However, it is also a question to put our noses in the wrong direction. A simplistic example of this question would be: Why was your great-grandfather not hit by a bus or horse so you would not have been born? This question does not matter to the family line (to you), since you were born, but, naturally, it does matter to those who lost dear family members in whatever accident. What I am trying to clarify is that no matter how deep your question - and coming from an absolute correct direction in itself - your question does not address the issue. The question whether Empty Nest is possible is based on that matter
is, not where matter came from.
Don't get me wrong: I am interested in where matter came from, but I am not interested in the light of Empty Nest where matter came from. Empty Nest is about materialization that has - inherently - an empty spot in the middle - or not. The single moment of importance for Empty Nest is the very first second.