Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Now here comes the controversy, I maintain that matter,and energy, are both products of mind, at the moment
of becoming from the "Void"=nothing,the nomena (protyle atom)the unmanifested Potentuality, Realized the Potentuality, and the manifestation
process began!! The empty nest is the "Void" the so called nothingness, but was in fact, the unmanifested potentual of all! We are all so to speak surfing on the skin of the baloon, as it continues ite "Inflatering journey"?
kind regards michael. |
Interesting thoughts you have, Michael. I am going to use your idea to explain my idea better (though I have the feeling you already have a good understanding of what I am trying to deliver). If materialization can ultimately all be brought back to being products of the mind then Empty Nest is that product of the mind that is inactive. Thinking has to start at a certain point, no matter which topic we refer to, and while it does not have to be linear (actually in most cases it is not), there has to be a beginning (but not necessarily an ending). Various deliveries of thinking exist, and we do not consider them to all start at one and the same place. Yet the very beginning of thought itself all point to a common center. Within this center I claim there is an un-activated part, right in the middle. Moving outwardly, all active thoughts have there own speed, their own rhythm, their own sequence, which can nevertheless all be construed as coming from this one center (before realizing independency). Some thoughts are slow and take a long time to 'mature,' while others are fast and are 'finished' in no time or taken over by other thoughts quickly.
If our universe is a place where the ultimate ruler is
thought then an inactive part of thought automatically exists in our universe as well. I consider the binary system a different but nevertheless also appropriate example. The only active ingredient of the binary system is 1, and the only inactive ingredient is 0. There are infinite numbers of 1s and 0s, yet the system itself as a whole can be seen as just 1 system; therefore it can be brought back
as a whole to just one of the two numbers, which means that the 0 must then be in hiding inside this single all-encompassing 1, the number that portrays the entire system. On this level 0 is inactive, but must still exist because without the 0 the binary system does not function, and must therefore be there from the start.