Quote: |
Originally Posted by baudrunner It occurs to me that you are inputting your posts from a PDA, Michael. Am I correct in this assumption? Those carriage returns and those spelling errors, no offense meant, could only occur as the result of your inputting text into a limited keypad crammed for space.
Mohan, I think that just because something is hypothetical doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. What it does mean is that it requires further investigation, because it seems to make sense based on the fact that it is curently being accepted by the community that the Universe is closed and infinitely expanding and that there appears to be evidence for a small cosmological constant therefore at the periphery of the expanding Universe space-time and matter are most probably continuing to be created, so space, as a creation, must therefore be made of something so why not gravitons, for lack of a better name? | In one of your posts in another thread you have yourself accepted you have difficulty in accepting photons. So i don't like to repeat your same words. Like you say we believe in the existense of photons by their interactions. However we are not yet sure of the interactions of gravitons-which makes it hypothetical.
__________________
"I never anticipate, - carpe diem - the past at least is one's own, which is one reason for making sure of the present."
-Byron |