Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Therefore your TOE is just a qualitative version of the quantitative ones many people are working on these days. |
I didn’t know about it, but these people don’t know about my methods.
We don’t need to invent false
nothing (false, detectable vacuum), because we’ve got real nothing (true, undetectable vacuum). I never show how to practice the system, which’s based on
nothing, but anyway have a kind of experience with it. But when I try to explain about
nothing to somebody theoretically, I find it most difficult for me.
E.g. I promised Omny to think over some method to explain how the separation took place within
nothing, Omny sure thinks I broke my word, but the matter is that I couldn’t invent such method and so can’t convey the idea, which is very clear to me.