Quote:
|
Originally Posted by baudrunner I'd rather not, since most of what you say is pure hyperbola and just contradicts most of what I say which has its roots for the most part in observation, empiricsim and logic. |
Baud, you mention what you say has its roots, for the most part, in observation, empiricism and logic, yet your logic does not comply with mathematics. In order for logic to be logic it must be mathematically and observationally provable... If I had it, I'd bet all the money in the world you can not prove the central premise of your own theory - the super-luminal. It is unprovable because it is outside of mathematical logic, just as I said - period!
If I be wrong, please show me the mathematical proof...
"People have screamed
god for years. It hasn't made him/her/it appear." me