View Single Post
bridge to unreality
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
AntonioLao
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,316
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 123x in 121 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
bridge to unreality - 03-16-2006, 01:02 PM

Is there such a bridge? Reading the last chapter of Penrose’s ‘The Road to Reality’ as a complete guide to the laws of the Universe could not possibly provide a satisfactory answer. As Penrose implied even such a road that leads to this bridge still does not yet exist. On the other hand, he also mentioned three distinctive spheres of reality and unreality somewhat recreated by this image:



It is noted that there are three bridges for connecting these spheres and only one has to do with physics, one to do with the mind, and the third to do with mathematics. If only physical concepts are used then the image can be changed into:



Furthermore it is a logical conclusion that only the sphere of matter (particle) that has been subjected too much measurements and experimental verifications even though energy (wave) has been quantized by QM. Therefore bridge 1 is now considered a well traveled road to the extent of becoming a multi-lane superhighway. However, bridge 2 and 3 leading to the mind are not yet fully realized.

Next to last, reality or unreality cannot be complete without solving some mysteries behind the following palindromes: STEP ON NO PETS, WAS IT A RAT I SAW, EVIL LIVE, and A MAN A PLAN A CANAL PANAMA.

The last of reality and unreality could still be strongly based on abstract algebraic nonsense of category theory that specifically study the directional ‘arrows’ of these three fundamental bridges even before they are built into concrete comprehensible physical objects. Its implication that it is too late for a new plan or design since the schema was already there at the outset waiting for its rediscovery.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Reply With Quote