Antonio,
Would each of the four pats have the same 'size' I mean, exist in same quantities? Or is there more constructive do than free do or vice versa, and more destructive undo than deconstructive undo or vice versa?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dleviwing Gullie;
Any term that infers motion (energy, force, mass, etc.) is going to be intimately related to "time", "space", and "space-time". It should not be viewed as an awe inspiring concept. I don't think Antonio's post provides proof of this relationship, it is only using this relationship just as so many others have done.. |
I know that time and motion mean the same, and that anything that impplies change will impply time, space, and space-time. In fact, for existence to be, there is a need of the five magic concepts: matter, energy, force, space-time. First, there is matter, and that impplies directly space and energy in previous form, and as secondary properties (but just as necessary) time and force. All I think is that the fact that we need a lot of time and a lot of energy to build a house and little time and little energy to destry it is the a proof that time and energy are totally related. There are many other proves, but this one I like because it requiers an obvious implication: space (house occupies) and force. And confirms my reduction of the universe to the 5 concepts.