thank you for making my point! Guille, Guille, Guille. Alchemy doesn't necessarily involve the so-called 'illuminaty' or other (fanciful) secret societies. Even if these things exist (and I really don't care one way or the other if they do), they do not define alchemy. I am not a fan of the DaVinci Code, Umberto Eco wrote a much better book on these times. I don't agree with the 'chart' you have created, I think it is a very poor tool to understand the interrelationships between science, art,philosophy, spirituality and math. You have proved my point, the science of today NEEDS to be more open (in my view,it is reductionist, to use your vernacular) to other ways of reaching the truth, because that's what it's all about, no? It appears that we will once again have to disagree, because the way you apprehend your environment is artificial to me.
__________________ The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears |