 "Gravity is not a property of mass"
Am I contradicting the father of modern physics here? You bet! Einstein is my idol as well as for many of those writting their fantasies here too. However I see him in the context of his time. He did not believe in the true nature of matter. He thought as the entire scientific community still does it about the "sacred" existence of particles with different elemental status and right to existence. Einstein was pretty confortable with the concept of "particleness" even when it come to define light. He didn't want to get deep into the obvious contradiction of duality but he agreed with the actual existence of subatomic particles in general. I disagree. I also disagree with his idea or views of a force called gravity as the result of the presence of mass in space [cosmos]. He included the mass of the sun and the mass of the rest of celestial bodies "in the same bag." That's not right!
Gravity is not an inherent property of mass but stars alone. The quantum mechanical process occuring inside the layers of the sun [stars] is the only one responsible for the presence of ORBITS used by planets to rotate around it/them.
Comets move across entire solar systems because they are spinning in elliptical orbits MADE [CREATED] by other star systems with a higher reach.
Is it possible that life on Earth had come from another star system via comets?
I do think so! It is highly possible that events were developed that way... I just don't see how we could prove it in retrospectve. We may find life or a form of it in a future comet and that could be a tip although not a hard evidence... unfortunately.
Show me an evidence [a substantial one] giving irrefutable evidences of neutral mass attracting neutral mass...? It's all an absurd! The geometry [as someone wrote in this forum before] is highly applicable in the case of relativity trying to explain gravity here on Earth, but it is not apllicable to the rest of the universe... And you know what? THEY ALREADY KNOW IT!
Show me a star without a "jupiter"? This challenge is in my book too... Just one example will do it! One star without a planet, moon asteroid or innert mass [celestial body]. There ain't any!
But why! Because gravity is manufactured inside stars and once it is there it will ATTRACT any neutral piece of ex-star COOLED after centuries or eons of hanging around in space... That's why!
We can't find systems of plain planets!! Ahuge planet "playing the roll of a sun" and attracting other planets to rotate in elliptical orbits... Show me one case and I'm out of here for good!
Thank you!
then... I stay!
HUMANBYDEFAULT  |