Theory of Everything - View Single Post

Guille · 04-05-2006, 04:55 PM

Science can only limit itself to be adecuate for the world, for society, for humanity, for the space-time point it is in. It can never give us knowledge which is truth, fro truth is something derived from our propositions, not from nature.

Now, leaving the philosophy of science and getting into science itself (even though there is not that much difference between them), I understand what you say, but it rellies on the 'absolute void'. This term is a bit confusing, because it seems it's the same concept as aether. Is there a difference (if so, what?)? Can the two concepts be together in the same explanation of the universe?

	(#10 (permalink))
Guille The Thinker Status: Offline Posts: 3,278 Thanks Given: 14 Thanked 9x in 9 Posts Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 47	04-05-2006, 04:55 PM Science can only limit itself to be adecuate for the world, for society, for humanity, for the space-time point it is in. It can never give us knowledge which is truth, fro truth is something derived from our propositions, not from nature. Now, leaving the philosophy of science and getting into science itself (even though there is not that much difference between them), I understand what you say, but it rellies on the 'absolute void'. This term is a bit confusing, because it seems it's the same concept as aether. Is there a difference (if so, what?)? Can the two concepts be together in the same explanation of the universe?