Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dleviwing Unlike time and space, matter does not have an intuitive axiomatic concept or definition.
Matter is something that occupies space and can be perceived by one or more senses; a physical body or the universe as a whole. In physics it is an entity displaying gravitation and inertia when at rest as well as when in motion.
This definition implies an intuitive understanding of our universe and infers that matter cannot exist without displaying gravitation and inertia at some condition of rest and motion. Let's provide an absolute definition for matter and state that "Matter is the fundamental substance of the universe". This doesn't seem to invoke awe and amazement, but it does invoke a vision of something that everything is made of and this is the only physical stuff of the universe. As such we must redefine our notions of mass and energy.
Absolute Matter is the fundamental substance of which all physical entities acquire form and existence. Only the Void exists as a separate entity within an infinite cosmos. |
Hi Dave, as you stated to Baud, "::What you state is simply a hypotheses or theory, NO FACT OR PROOF. Have we sent a craft far enough to test that concept? As I've stated many times: "any concept of a beginning is beyond proof". My concept is as good, and possibly better, than current concepts.::" the same statement also applies to your own statement, does it not?
Epistemologically, we can not know what or which is first and fundamental, matter or energy - OR? To me though, the only logic that makes sense is that the infinite energy singularity produced finite matter in the infinite space/void. This is simply my observation of the facts when I look up, and also of what I know of cosmology and physics histories, theories and maths. Can I prove any of it? No? Can anyone? I think not! Logical mathematical truth is the intuitive grand mystery - so far!
regards