[humanbydefault]

However the fact that those hardly detectable variations are subject today to some sort of "renormalization process" does not mean they are not real... does it?
Tell me something: How sure could we be that those aspects I have mentioned above do not account for part of those unstable reasons preventing us from achieving a conclusive figure in the final search for the gravitational constant?
Aren't we looking at things from erroneus perspectives perhaps?
It is true that if a given planet had a greater mass than others [for example] it will exert a greater gravitational force upon those walking upon its surface right? For those planning to walk on Jupiter's soil the task will be almost impossible compared to wlaking here on Earth. But we have [intentionally or not] forgeting to realized that there is an interesting pattern in the shape of those planets rotating in this system. With a couple of exceptions [mars perhaps...] planets increase their mass as we move from Mercury Toward Jupiter and the pattern suddenly reverses as we move from there to Pluto... Isn't it weird?
Other unexplained phenomenon is the ellipticity of those orbits! You see Keppler was the first [we know] who spoke about the actual elliptical shape of the planets in the solar system... But what about its reasons for being that way???
It's a long shot, I know! But Isn't it a coincidence that the shape of the momentum of energy around the atom is pretty close to the shape of those planets? They are [mostly with Mars as an exception] elliptical and not spherically perfect.
Then you have the fact that STANDING WAVES show exactly the same elliptical shape when they rise from the interference between two incoming waves. To make things even more "suspicious" you find that all them decrease their density according with the inverse of the square distance...
Gravity and electromagnetism to mention just a couple of them.
Wouldn't be too crazy to assume that the maximum gravitational area was located at the very core of each planet due to the same cause that makes them exist in their orbits? Of course the presence of a given magnitude of mass spinning in space around a star could be explained by the actual density of the vacuum "dictated" by the star itself. (!)
In magnetism we can not explain the force emanating from the magnet at least we assume that all the spins and their net directions were amplfied to reach that level of attracting force. It is all because of the nature of the vacuum itself, but if there were not by the spin interaction occurring in ferromagnetic materials magnetism would have never existed in physical reality would it?
If we have [as we speak] not being able to admit the true nature of magnetism and the magnetic field... How could you expect to have an agreement about a force that defies our instruments all times... (?)
They are in fact [as it's been stated so many times in the past] the result of the same underlining process: a quantum mechanical one based on the amplification of standing waves in space and at the same time responsible for a physical REALITY that we can't understand. Our nature of "solids" prevent us from looking at the core of the problem. Reality is made in deeper levels or dimension that we have no access to it!
Only with our cognitive powers and abilites those puzzles will be one day understood completely.
humanbydefault