View Single Post
WSM's "Alternate" Gravitational Forces...
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Lloyd Gillespie
9th degree Black Belt
Lloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura about
 
Lloyd Gillespie's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,579
Thanks Given: 114
Thanked 45x in 43 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 26
   
WSM's "Alternate" Gravitational Forces... - 04-12-2006, 07:27 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by humanbydefault

What would happen then to the actual gravitational constant on Earth?
This is when the trully controversial part comes in!
There is an overall and generalized assumption that the greater the mass of a planet the greater will be the pulling force toward it's surface [gravity].
But! If the net mass of the Earth increased after joinning a piece of the moon, then... will gravity be stronger or weaker after that?
Lts's see it!
I SAY NO WAY! Gravity will be weaker now that the compensation process mass-core-gravity achieved a better status toward balance. That's the reason the rest of the pieces left behind the desintegration process of the moon will stay in a new orbit far distant than the one occupy by today's moon.
The challenge is on...HUMANBYDEFAULT
HBD, you have more or less described what I have mentioned before. Gravity is the difference of in and out wave forces, of not only the sun, but all the other suns and matter in the universe. As a matter of fact your very description of size and distance from our sun may possibly figure to show the true nature of gravity, i.e., the difference of wave forces when planet densities are considered and truly figured. I mentioned elswere that the four neutrino experiments have detected more wave forces coming into the earth than exiting, due most likely to such density. Those outer planets being further from the sun fits perfectly with what you mentioned about the change with distance. I think we need only do the math to prove what gravity really is, i.e., the entire universe's differences of in/out wave forces. If you have read this correctly, in conjunction with your posts, you will notice that the wave's forces repel, not attract completely, to create such gravity... What do you think?

regards

p.s.
You didn't catch this when I posted befor to Dave, even though you answered. Now, with your own ideas coming so close, do you catch the samenesses...?

Dave, have you come across this idea? Gravity is the force velocity differences of incoming and outgoing waves/particles. Gravity is created by the velocity forces of the entire energy/matter universe's wave/particle differences, as the trillions to the power of trillions, pass in toward our planet, and the lesser number that pass out of our planet. The difference in the number of incoming wave/particles and outgoing wave/particles has already been proven by the world's recent discovery of nutrino differences, of nutrinos collected in the four collectors around the world. The experiments showed a larger number of incoming through the atmosphere, as those passing completely through the earth, and out. Transferring this information and mathematics to the universe's entire wave energy/matter structure sending energy waves in all directions infinitely and equally, yet some annialating as passing through the earth, gives a possible deffinition and mathematics of a new gravity theory and possible reality, does it not? What do you think?


"To develop the skill of correct thinking is in the first place to learn what you have to disregard. In order to go on, you have to know what to leave out; this is the essence of effective thinking." Kurt Godel
"Time and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live." Albert Einstein
"The uncertainty principle is an absolute, finite, universal constant." L.G.
"The tick-tick-tick of the cesium atom is a sliding-time-scaler constant of all finite universal motion." L.G.
  
Reply With Quote